Re: [HACKERS] Re: Odd behavior in regression test?
От | Peter T Mount |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Odd behavior in regression test? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.3.95.980613110146.16365B-100000@retep.org.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Odd behavior in regression test? (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 13 Jun 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Is it possible that the recent change from fork/exec to just fork leaves > > the postmaster more exposed? I can imagine that it might, but don't have > > any direct experience with it so am just guessing. Any other ideas? Do > > people see this on other platforms? This is the first time I can recall > > seeing the postmaster go away on a crash of a backend (but of course my > > memory isn't what it should be :) > > My guess is that the postmaster can no longer restart its backends after > one of them aborts. Something I need to check into perhaps. Yesterday, while I was working on the Large Object Orphaning problem, I was having similar problems. I had to stop and restart the postmaster before I could do anything afterwards. -- Peter T Mount peter@retep.org.uk or petermount@earthling.net Main Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk ************ Someday I may rebuild this signature completely ;-) ************ Work Homepage: http://www.maidstone.gov.uk Work EMail: peter@maidstone.gov.uk
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: