Re: [INTERFACES] binary insert with JDBC

On Wed, 13 May 1998, Sean Reilly wrote:

> Hello,
> Thanks for taking the time to reply =)
>
>
> I'm using version 6.3.2.  I just tried using blobs and it seems to
> take an unusually long time to retrieve the blobs (after the record
> has been retrieved).  Since I know my data will be under 512 bytes,
> is there any way I can store it directly in a field in the table so
> I can avoid the extra lookup?  If not, is there any way that I can
> speed up the retrieval of the blob (insertion speed doesn't matter)?
> I've already tried creating an index for the oid, but it didn't help
> much.

There is some overhead with BLOBS: On the first call, the driver has
several queries to perform to set itself up. After that, accessing a blob
is a minimum of three fastpath calls (lo_open, lo_read, lo_close).

There isn't a way (yet) to store directly into a table. There was some
discussion a few weeks ago about this, and I have started to look at this,
but it wont be available until 6.4

--
Peter T Mount peter@retep.org.uk or petermount@earthling.net
Main Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk
************ Someday I may rebuild this signature completely ;-) ************
Work Homepage: http://www.maidstone.gov.uk Work EMail: peter@maidstone.gov.uk