Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for async support in libpq
От | Peter T Mount |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for async support in libpq |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.3.95.980419223421.23997D-100000@retep.org.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for async support in libpq (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for async support in libpq
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Just a thought. Tom is after some scheme to receive notification messages, out side the normal network stream, then why not add a second network connection for this. We could have in libpq, some new calls, to open, handle requests, and to close the connection. It's then up to the client to handle these, so existing clients will not be broken. This would be a doddle to do in Java, and shouldn't be too difficult for libpq, and libpgtcl (call backs are almost as simple to do in tcl as they are in Java). Just a couple of thoughts... -- Peter T Mount peter@retep.org.uk or petermount@earthling.net Main Homepage: http://www.demon.co.uk/finder (moving soon to www.retep.org.uk) ************ Someday I may rebuild this signature completely ;-) ************ Work Homepage: http://www.maidstone.gov.uk Work EMail: peter@maidstone.gov.uk
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: