Re: [HACKERS] lock failed and buffer leak
От | Peter T Mount |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] lock failed and buffer leak |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.3.95.980418113451.7910B-100000@maidast.demon.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | lock failed and buffer leak ("SC Altex Impex SRL" <office.Altex@decebal.ro>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 17 Apr 1998, SC Altex Impex SRL wrote: > testing the (postgresql 6.3.1 included) jdbc ImageViewer example. > It works. No errors. > But in the pgsql log I fond these (actually many more): > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ----------- > Apr 17 10:08:02 digital logger: NOTICE: DateStyle is Postgres with US > (NonEuropean) conventions This one is caused by the driver finding out what datestyle is in use. This is normal. > Apr 17 10:08:07 digital logger: NOTICE: buffer leak [65] detected in > BufferPoolCheckLeak() > Apr 17 10:08:07 digital logger: NOTICE: LockRelease: locktable lookup > failed, no lock > Apr 17 10:08:07 digital logger: NOTICE: buffer leak [75] detected in > BufferPoolCheckLeak() > Apr 17 10:08:08 digital logger: NOTICE: LockRelease: locktable lookup > failed, no lock > Apr 17 10:08:47 digital logger: NOTICE: buffer leak [65] detected in > BufferPoolCheckLeak() These are caused by the large object api in the backend. I'm not sure where these are caused by, but when I was fixing that part of the backend (to get it working for JDBC), I couldn't see it. [Hackers: any ideas?] -- Peter T Mount petermount@earthling.net or pmount@maidast.demon.co.uk Main Homepage: http://www.demon.co.uk/finder Work Homepage: http://www.maidstone.gov.uk Work EMail: peter@maidstone.gov.uk
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: