Re: [INTERFACES] Perl module: Postgres - obsolete?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dan Brickley
Тема Re: [INTERFACES] Perl module: Postgres - obsolete?
Дата
Msg-id Pine.HPP.3.96.980307185112.3270C-100000@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [INTERFACES] Perl module: Postgres - obsolete?  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
Ответы Re: [INTERFACES] Perl module: Postgres - obsolete?
Список pgsql-interfaces
On Sat, 7 Mar 1998, The Hermit Hacker wrote:

> On Sat, 7 Mar 1998, Dan Brickley wrote:
>
> > I've been using this module ever since, and am now wondering how safe
> > it'll be with 6.3. It needed a further tweak to Makefile.PL this time
> > (changed libpq.so.1 to libpq.so.1.1). In the medium term I will fix my
> > code to use a more up to date Perl interface; in the meantime I'd be
> > grateful for any advice. Am I likely to damage my data or crash the
> > postmaster? The number change from 1 to 1.1 seems to indicate that the
> > library should still work...
>
>     Is there a reason to not use the perl5 interface included with
> v6.3? *raised eyebrow*

Yep, my legacy code ;-)

I've a /cgi-bin/dbase script written last year when the other library
seemed OK. It shouldn't need too much reworking to move over to the new
interface, but I won't be able to do this immediately. I'd really like to
move to 6.3 first so I can take advantage of the improved ODBC support.

I want to hack a whois++ interface to PostgreSQL at some point soon, and
will be using the standard perl5 library for that.

cheers,

Dan




--
Daniel.Brickley@bristol.ac.uk
Research and Development Unit                    tel: +44(0)117 9288478
Institute for Learning and Research Technology   http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
University of Bristol,  Bristol BS8 1TN, UK.     fax: +44(0)117 9288473


В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: The Hermit Hacker
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [INTERFACES] Perl module: Postgres - obsolete?
Следующее
От: The Hermit Hacker
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [INTERFACES] Perl module: Postgres - obsolete?