Re: postgreSQL on NAS/SAN?
От | Jonathan Bartlett |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgreSQL on NAS/SAN? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.GSU.4.44.0306170750190.11938-100000@eskimo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgreSQL on NAS/SAN? (Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
There is a system which uses your serial port so that if server B detects server A goes down, it will send a signal over the serial port which disconnects server A's power supply. That way, server B never "accidentally" takes over for server A when in fact server A is still running. I don't remember where these are sold, but they were mentioned in the MissionCriticalLinux system documentation. Jon On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 15:41:45 +0200, > Daniel Seichter <daniel@dseichter.de> wrote: > > Hello Scott, > > > > > Are you looking more for failover, load balancing, hot > > > spare? > > I am looking for a hot spare, so if one server crashed, the second will > > "spare" it, because if this database will be down (down is meant for longer > > than 2 hours) more than two other databases will not continue working (they > > could continue working, but without new data, so it will be senseless). > > Once the orignal postmaster has stopped running (say because its server > died) you could run a different postmaster (on say another server) and > access the same data on your storage system. But if you do this you > will want some sort of safety system so that two postmasters can't > accidentally run at the same time. The normal interlock won't work for you > because it keeps a PID file and checks to see if the pid in that file (if any) > is still running. That doesn't work accross servers. > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: