Re: posix_fadvise v22
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: posix_fadvise v22 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.GSO.4.64.0901021416310.15834@westnet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: posix_fadvise v22 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: posix_fadvise v22
Re: posix_fadvise v22 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Tom Lane wrote: > ISTM that you *should* be able to see an improvement on even > single-spindle systems, due to better overlapping of CPU and I/O effort. The earlier synthetic tests I did: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-09/msg01401.php Showed a substantial speedup even in the single spindle case on a couple of systems, but one didn't really seem to benefit. So we could theorize that Robert's test system is more like that one. If someone can help out with making a more formal test case showing this in action, I'll dig into the details of what's different between that system and the others. -- * Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: