Re: Fastest way to restore a database
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Fastest way to restore a database |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.GSO.4.64.0809121404530.29222@westnet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Fastest way to restore a database (William Garrison <postgres@mobydisk.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Fastest way to restore a database
Re: Fastest way to restore a database |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, William Garrison wrote: > Is there a definitive list of things to do? That section of the documention is pretty good: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/populate.html The main thing it's missing is a discussion of how to cut down on disk commit overhead by either usinc async commit or turning fsync off. If you've got a good caching controller that may not be needed though. The other large chunk of information it doesn't really go into is what server tuning you could do to improve general performance, which obviously would then help with loading as well. http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Tuning_Your_PostgreSQL_Server goes over much of that. > * Turn off full_page_writes > Don’t write the WAL archives in a safe way. But we don’t need WAL archives > during a restore. Future versions of postgres will let you turn off WAL > archives entirely Ideally you'd be using COPY such that the table was just created or truncated before loading, which (if archive_mode is off) keeps them from being WAL logged, as described in 14.4.7. If you do that and vastly increase checkpoint_segments, full_page_writes has minimal impact. > * Increase the checkpoint_segments parameter (the default is 3 – so... maybe > 10?) 64-256 is the usual range you'll see people using for bulk loading. > * Increase the maintenance_work_mem setting to 512MB I haven't really seen any real improvement setting that over 256MB. If you've got RAM to waste it doesn't really matter if you set it too high though. -- * Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: