Re: Wiki CSS
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Wiki CSS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.GSO.4.64.0809091924310.20414@westnet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Wiki CSS (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Wiki CSS
|
Список | pgsql-www |
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, David Fetter wrote: > The standard doesn't number them the way you're doing, and I need to be > able to override it. Just to clarify, if somebody doesn't use actual > HTML and the given classes for <li> tags, nothing will change. I'm not familiar enough with CSS to say whether that's true or not. I do suspect there was a way to accomplish this for a page without touching common.css like that. I would have certainly asked that question here and waited a while for feedback before touching anything. What I am uncomfortable with is the way this page was edited. The common.css file is cached by browsers for a long time. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Catalogue_of_CSS_classes for comments about that. Looks like it was about three hours you experimented there to get that right. It really bothers me that changes that impact the whole site were made like that. Someone who happened to grab one of your intermediate files during that period is stuck with that one for the next month unless they know the proper reload trick. What if you'd have accidentally broken something? I personally would never touch common.css with an untested change on this Wiki. I have a private MediaWiki installation I use for experiments like that, and I'd only roll out a system-wide change on the PG Wiki that had been confirmed to work there first. In this case, I don't think you actually did any harm, but the way this all happened is not something I'd like to see repeated. -- * Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: