Re: [gsmith@gregsmith.com: Re: [patch] GUC source file and line number]

On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Magnus Hagander wrote:

>> (I dropped the "default" stuff for now, as it doesn't seem that a
>> consensus has been reached on that topic.)
>
> This is one of the reasons I suggested keeping that one as a separate
> patch in the first place. The other main reason being that once it gets
> applied, you really want it to be two different revisions, to clearly
> keep them apart

This means some committer is going to have to make a second pass over the 
same section of code and do testing there more than once, that's a waste 
of time I was trying to avoid.  Also, any standalone patch I submit right 
now won't apply cleanly if the source file/line patch is committed.

If nobody cares about doing that work twice, I'll re-submit a separate 
patch once this one is resolved one way or another.  I hope you snagged 
the documentation update I added to your patch though.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD