Re: Overhauling GUCS
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Overhauling GUCS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.GSO.4.64.0806041720520.26357@westnet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Overhauling GUCS (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Overhauling GUCS
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 4 Jun 2008, Tom Lane wrote: > The real problem we need to solve is how to allow newbies to have the > system auto-configured to something that more or less solves their > problems. Putting the config settings in XML does not accomplish that, > and neither does putting them inside the database. The subtle issue here is that what makes sense for the database configuration changes over time; there's not just one initial generation and you're done. postgresql.conf files can end up moving from one machine to another for example. I think something that doesn't recognize that reality and move toward a "tune-up" capability as well as initial generation wouldn't be as useful, and that's where putting the settings inside the database helps so much. Also, there's a certain elegance to having a optimization tool that works again either a new installation or an existing one. I personally have zero interest in a one-shot config generator. It just doesn't solve the problems I see in the field. Performance starts out just fine even with the default settings when people first start, and then goes to hell after the system has been running for a while (and possibly moved to another machine). By that point nobody wants to mess with their configuration file unless it's one simple change at a time. -- * Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: