On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Perhaps it's because it was split in two by a monthly boundary? (I
> didn't look.)
That looks to be it. There's also another split it did manage to catch
where the original author started a new thread themselves that got linked
in. That sort of thing (renamed or improperly continued thread on the
same topic) is another spot where someone keeping track of things manually
can end up with a more consistant view of the discussion than the archives
provide.
--
* Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD