Re: Postgres 8.2 memory weirdness
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres 8.2 memory weirdness |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.GSO.4.64.0801251256540.4724@westnet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres 8.2 memory weirdness ("Tory M Blue" <tmblue@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgres 8.2 memory weirdness
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Tory M Blue wrote: > I doubled the checkpoint segments yesterday and have not seen any > warnings. Will run with segments of 100 for a while and see how things > look.. Anyway to make sure that there is not a number between 50 and > 100 that makes more sense? More segments means more disk space taken up with them and a longer crash recovery. Those are the downsides; if you can live with those there's no reason to run at <100 if that works for you. Fine-tuning here isn't really that helpful. I'm a little confused by your report through because you should still be seeing regular checkpoint warnings if you set checkpoint_warning = 3600s , they should just be spaced further apart. -- * Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: