Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.GSO.4.64.0712261733390.10252@westnet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10 (david@lang.hm) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007, david@lang.hm wrote: > yes, the two linux software implementations only read from one disk, but I > have seen hardware implementations where it reads from both drives, and if > they disagree it returns a read error rather then possibly invalid data (it's > up to the admin to figure out which drive is bad at that point). Right, many of the old implementations did that; even the Wikipedia article on this subject mentions it in the "RAID 1 performance" section: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_RAID_levels The thing that changed is on modern drives, the internal error detection and correction is good enough that if you lose a sector, the drive will normally figure that out at the firmware level and return a read error rather than bad data. That lowers of the odds of one drive becoming corrupted and returning a bad sector as a result enough that the overhead of reading from both drives isn't considered as important. I'm not aware of a current card that does that but I wouldn't be surprised to discover one existed. -- * Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: