Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.GSO.4.64.0711301815480.3906@westnet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance (Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh@pop.jaring.my>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Lincoln Yeoh wrote: > Anecdotal - I have found "smart" raid controllers to fail more often than > dumb scsi controllers (or even SATA/PATA controllers), and some seem more > failure prone than semi-decent operating systems. You'd need to name some names here for this to mean too much. There are plenty of positively miserable RAID controllers out there. I wouldn't trust the cards from Adaptec, Promise, and Highpoint to correctly store a database about what's in my pockets. > What's more likely in most places is somebody powering down the server > abruptly, and then fsync=off could hurt :). Here you're hitting on the real point. If a proposed solution adds potential for database corruption if someone trips over the server cord, it's not really a solution at all. -- * Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: