Re: Common criteria evaluation?
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Common criteria evaluation? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.GSO.4.64.0711160015500.20775@westnet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Common criteria evaluation? (Geoff <geoffwalsh@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Common criteria evaluation?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Geoff wrote: > I know an older version of PostgreSQL for Linux was evaluated at EAL 1 > in Japan. Right, by NTT: http://www.nttdata.co.jp/services/postgreSQL/english.html Note that the certified version included some small modifications, it wasn't the regular release that made it. 8.1.5 isn't that old of a version; the current release in that branch is 8.1.10 and it's completely sensible to consider rolling out even a new system on 8.1 right now. There are some issues [1] even with adopting that one certified version right now. > Are there any other versions that are going through this now? The most obvious vendor to find this worth the trouble is Sun, the last recent statement I saw about this topic suggested that was just on their radar: http://blogs.ittoolbox.com/database/soup/archives/jpug-2007-report-16736 Josh may chime in with an update here, but I doubt that's made much progress yet. [1] The changes between 8.1.5 and 8.1.10 were relatively small and focused on bug fixes, but there were a few compelling ones that would make deploying 8.1.5 a little risky. 8.1.7 fixed a notable security issue and 8.1.9 took care of a problem that could corrupt data. Even if it were feasible for you to self-certify in some fashion, the only path there that would make sense would be extracting the changes made to reach EAL1 in that customized 8.1.5, then apply at least those important patches. -- * Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: