Re: top for postgresql (ptop?)
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: top for postgresql (ptop?) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.GSO.4.64.0709252351030.24010@westnet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: top for postgresql (ptop?) ("Luke Lonergan" <llonergan@greenplum.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: top for postgresql (ptop?)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Luke Lonergan wrote: > One strategy we've considered is to use the same approach as "pstack" on > Solaris - it takes a pid and dumps the stack of a backend, which clearly > shows which executor node is being worked on currently. I think pstack > uses dtrace underneath the hood... pstack has been around since the SunOS days, long before dtrace was in Solaris, so it at least used to operate some other way. I know they added some features to Solaris 10 that let pstack look into Java librarites that may leverage dtrace, but I don't believe the internals of the main pstack tool rely on it when looking at regular processes. It's also worth noting that there's a similar Linux utility called gstack. -- * Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: