Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL: fight
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL: fight |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.GSO.4.64.0707250831050.10666@westnet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL: fight (Lukas Kahwe Smith <smith@pooteeweet.org>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: > As such it should mention version numbers of MySQL where ever possible > to make it clear which version of MySQL and PostgreSQL is compared in > every section. The majority of the links into the MySQL documentation consistantly point to the current production version (5.0). I wanted to see what general content expansion might happen before going through the exercise of seeing if anything has changed in the upcoming 5.1 so I only have to do that once. For example, the initial edits people have made make it obvious that this document should address MySQL's foreign key and check constraint limitations, which wasn't even on my radar initially. Until the strict SQL mode appeared in MySQL 5.0, there were so many gross problems that I didn't even really consider the software a database, and therefore I haven't been paying attention to its more subtle issues until relatively recently. > Its one of those things that will generate trouble if its not acurate > and is not updated frequently enough. You are absolutely correct that the specific version of each software needs to be nailed down as a defense against updates making the content out of date. As for the accuracy part, my initial approach here was to highlight general statements about the areas people should be aware of, and then point directly into their documentation for the details. The idea is not to do any serious mud-slinging, and instead just point out where the mud is. -- * Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: