Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.GSO.4.64.0707220134200.20660@westnet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007, Tom Lane wrote: > With autovac off I see 8.3 as faster than 8.2 in pgbench. Indeed. I'm seeing much better pgbench results from HEAD than 8.2 when I set the configurations up identically. I'm hoping to have a comparison set to show everyone this week. > and use -t at least 1000 or so (otherwise startup transients are > significant). I personally consider any pgbench run that lasts less than several minutes noise. On a system that hits 500 TPS like Pavel's, I'd want to see around 100,000 transactions before I consider the results significant. And then I'd want a set of 3 at each configuration because even with longer runs, you occasionally get really odd results. Until you have 3 it can be unclear which is the weird one. -- * Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: