Re: Logging checkpoints and other slowdown causes
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Logging checkpoints and other slowdown causes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.GSO.4.64.0705282200190.28443@westnet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Logging checkpoints and other slowdown causes (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Logging checkpoints and other slowdown causes
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
I'll take another stab at refining this can of worms I opened. The one thing I noticed on a quick review is that it's almost possible to skip all the calls to gettimeofday if log_checkpoints is off now. I'd like to make that a specific goal, because that will make me feel better that adding this code has almost no performance impact relative to now unless you turn the feature on. I agree with Simon that tracking create/drop separately is unnecessary. As for why all the timing info is in ms, given the scale of the numbers typically encountered I found it easier to work with. I originally wanted resolution down to 0.1ms if the underlying OS supports it, which means 4 figures to the right of the decimal point if the unit was switched to seconds. Quite often the times reported are less than 100ms, so you'll normally be dealing with fractional part of a second. If we take Heikki's example: LOG: checkpoint complete; buffers written=3.1 MB (9.6%) write=96.8 ms sync=32.0 ms And switch it to seconds: LOG: checkpoint complete; buffers written=3.1 MB (9.6%) write=0.0968 ms sync=0.0320 ms I don't find that as easy to work with. The only way a timing in seconds would look OK is if the resolution of the whole thing is reduced to ms, which then makes 3 decimal points--easy to read as ms instead. Having stared at a fair amount of this data now, that's probably fine; I'll collect up some more data on it from a fast server this week to confirm whether's it's worthless precision or worth capturing. -- * Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: