Re: Feature Request --- was: PostgreSQL Performance Tuning
| От | Greg Smith |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Feature Request --- was: PostgreSQL Performance Tuning |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | Pine.GSO.4.64.0705012134370.24215@westnet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Feature Request --- was: PostgreSQL Performance Tuning (Kevin Hunter <hunteke@earlham.edu>) |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Kevin Hunter wrote: > I recognize that PostgreSQL and MySQL try to address different > problem-areas, but is this one reason why a lot of people with whom I > talk prefer MySQL? Because PostgreSQL is so "slooow" out of the box? It doesn't help, but there are many other differences that are as big or bigger. Here are a few samples off the top of my head: 1) Performance issues due to MVCC (MySQL fans love to point out how fast they can do select count(*) from x) 2) Not knowing you have to run vacuum analyze and therefore never seeing a good query result 3) Unfair comparison of PostgreSQL with robust WAL vs. MySQL+MyISAM on write-heavy worksloads These are real issues, which of course stack on top of things like outdated opinions from older PG releases with performance issues resolved in the last few years. -- * Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: