Re: Fragmentation of WAL files
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Fragmentation of WAL files |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.GSO.4.64.0704270019060.8684@westnet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Fragmentation of WAL files (Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Bill Moran wrote: > I've seen marketing material that claims that modern NTFS doesn't suffer > performance problems from fragmentation. You're only reading half of the marketing material then. For a balanced picture, read the stuff generated by the companies that sell defragmenting tools. A good one to start with is http://files.diskeeper.com/pdf/HowFileFragmentationOccursonWindowsXP.pdf Going back to the Jim's original question, they suggest a Microsoft paper that talks about how the defrag report can be misleading in respect to open files. See http://support.microsoft.com/kb/228198 Also, some of the most interesting details they gloss over are specific to which version of Windows you're using; the reference guide to the subject of how NTFS decides how much space to pre-allocate at a time is available at http://support.microsoft.com/kb/841551 (ZIP file wrapped into EXE, yuck!) If you compare them, you can see that the approach they're using in NTFS has evolved to become more like that used by a good UNIX filesystem over time. I think your typical UNIX still has a healthy lead in this area, but the difference isn't as big as it used to be. -- * Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: