Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance
От | Steve |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.GSO.4.64.0704121925280.17955@kittyhawk.tanabi.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
It's a redhat enterprise machine running AMD x64 processors. Linux ers3.dddcorp.com 2.6.9-42.0.10.ELsmp #1 SMP Fri Feb 16 17:13:42 EST 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux It was compiled by me, straight up, nothing weird at all, no odd compiler options or wahtever :) So yeah :/ I'm quite baffled as well, Talk to you later, Steve On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, Tom Lane wrote: > Steve <cheetah@tanabi.org> writes: >> Here's my planner parameters: > > I copied all these, and my 8.2.x still likes the bitmap scan a lot > better than the seqscan. Furthermore, I double-checked the CVS history > and there definitely haven't been any changes in that area in REL8_2 > branch since 8.2.3. So I'm a bit baffled. Maybe the misbehavior is > platform-specific ... what are you on exactly? Is there anything > nonstandard about your Postgres installation? > > regards, tom lane >
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: