Re: Two billion records ok?
От | Oleg Bartunov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Two billion records ok? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.GSO.4.63.0609050937530.16344@ra.sai.msu.su обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Two billion records ok? (Nick Bower <nick@nickbower.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Two billion records ok?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Nick, if you need very fast spatial queries (spherical) you may use our Q3C module for POstgreSQL (q3c.sf.net). We use it for providing access to very big astronomical catalogs. Oleg On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Nick Bower wrote: > We're considering using Postgresql for storing gridded metadata - each point > of our grids has a variety of metadata attached to it (including lat/lon, > measurements, etc) and would constitute a record in Postgresql+Postgis. > > Size-wise, grids are about 4000x700 and are collected twice daily over say 10 > years. As mentioned, each record would have up to 50 metadata attributes > (columns) including geom, floats, varchars etc. > > So given 4000x700x2x365x10 > 2 billion, is this going to be a problem if we > will be wanting to query on datetimes, Postgis lat/lon, and integer-based > metadata flags? > > If however I'm forced to sub-sample the grid, what rule of thumb should I be > looking to be constrained by? > > Thanks for any pointers, Nick > > PS - Feel free to throw in any other ideas of grid-suitable databases :) > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org > Regards, Oleg _____________________________________________________________ Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (www.astronet.ru), Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/ phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: