unexpected plan for unused table (8.1dev)
От | Oleg Bartunov |
---|---|
Тема | unexpected plan for unused table (8.1dev) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.GSO.4.63.0508290945250.16397@ra.sai.msu.su обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: unexpected plan for unused table (8.1dev)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi there, I'm a bit surprised how bad could be plan for unused table. I had to cancel second query :) tp=# explain analyze select tp_rewrite_substitute(query, 'select p.name_tsquery, p.name_alias_tsquery from place p') from to_tsquery('new&york&hotel') as query; y; QUERY PLAN --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FunctionScan on query (cost=0.00..15.00 rows=1000 width=32) (actual time=3801.069..3801.071 rows=1 loops=1) Total runtime:3801.107 ms (2 rows) tp=# explain analyze select tp_rewrite_substitute(query, 'select p.name_tsquery, p.name_alias_tsquery from place p') from place, to_tsquery('new&york&hotel') as query; ^^^^^ Here is plan without analyze: tp=# explain select tp_rewrite_substitute(query, 'select p.name_tsquery, p.name_alias_tsquery from place p') from place, to_tsquery('new&york&hotel') as query; QUERY PLAN --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Nested Loop (cost=13.50..44280620.90 rows=1964340000width=32) -> Seq Scan on place (cost=0.00..82957.40 rows=1964340 width=0) -> Materialize (cost=13.50..23.50rows=1000 width=32) -> Function Scan on query (cost=0.00..12.50 rows=1000 width=32) (4 rows) The only difference is unused table 'place' in FROM-clause. I typed in by mistake, but I think optimizer could figure out not to take into account this table. Regards, Oleg _____________________________________________________________ Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet, Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia) Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/ phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: