Re: understanding pg_stat* numbers
От | Oleg Bartunov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: understanding pg_stat* numbers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.GSO.4.62.0503270012360.17555@ra.sai.msu.su обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: understanding pg_stat* numbers (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005, Tom Lane wrote: > Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su> writes: >> I'm looking for blocks *actually* read from disk, since IO is the most >> important factor. > > Well, you won't find that out from Postgres, since it has no idea > whether a read() request was satisfied from kernel disk cache or had > to actually go to disk. so, what's the usefulness of pg_stat* ? From my experiments I feel heap_blks_read is the table blocks read from disk, well, sort of, and heap_blks_hit - from buffer. At least, I observed when I repeat the same query several times (heap_blks_read+heap_blks_hit) doesn't changed while more blocks come from heap_blks_hit. > > You could turn on log_statement_stats to get some possibly-more-reliable > numbers from the kernel via getrusage(), but this will only tell you > about totals across the whole backend process, not per-relation ... > Hmm, it's impossible to do researching :( We have so many parameters and almost no reliable stats. How do you believe you did a good choice ? It's common in db worlds to have IO statistics (timings are not important) to research algorithms and implementation. > regards, tom lane > Regards, Oleg _____________________________________________________________ Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet, Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia) Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/ phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: