Re: win32 performance - fsync question
От | Evgeny Rodichev |
---|---|
Тема | Re: win32 performance - fsync question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.GSO.4.62.0502172155210.21926@ra.sai.msu.su обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: win32 performance - fsync question ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: win32 performance - fsync question
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
There are two different concerns here. 1. transactions loss because of unexpected power loss and/or system failure 2. inconsistent database state For many application (1) is fairly acceptable, and (2) is not. So I'd like to formulate my questions by another way. - if PostgeSQL is running without fsync, and power loss occur, which kind of damage is possible? 1, 2, or both? - it looks like with proper fwrite/fflush policy it is possible to guarantee that only transactions loss may occur, but database keeps some consistent state as before (several) last transactions. Is it true for PostgeSQL? Regards, E.R. ________________________________________________________________________e Evgeny Rodichev Sternberg Astronomical Institute email: er@sai.msu.su Moscow State University Phone: 007 (095) 939 2383 Fax: 007 (095) 932 8841 http://www.sai.msu.su/~er
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: