Re: Tsearch2 really slower than ilike ?
От | Oleg Bartunov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Tsearch2 really slower than ilike ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.GSO.4.61.0411161915050.10356@ra.sai.msu.su обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Tsearch2 really slower than ilike ? (Hervé Piedvache <herve@elma.fr>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
could you provide me a dump of your table (just id and tsvector columns), so I could try on my computer. Also, plain query (simple and clean) which demonstrated your problem would be preferred next time ! Oleg On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, [iso-8859-15] Herv? Piedvache wrote: > Michael, > > Le Mardi 16 Novembre 2004 16:32, Michael Fuhr a ?crit : >> On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 03:55:58PM +0100, Herv? Piedvache wrote: >>> WHERE s.idx_site_name @@ to_tsquery('atari'); >> >> How much text does each site_name field contain? From the field >> name I'd guess only a few words. Based on my own experience, if >> the fields were documents containing thousands of words then I'd >> expect tsearch2 to be faster than ILIKE by an order of magnitude >> or more. > > Yes site name ... is company names or web site name ... so not many word in > each record ... but I don't understand why more words are more efficient than > few words ?? sorry ... > > Regards, > Regards, Oleg _____________________________________________________________ Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet, Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia) Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/ phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: