Re: Subtle pg_dump problem...
От | Oleg Bartunov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Subtle pg_dump problem... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.GSO.4.58.0405121924330.9525@ra.sai.msu.su обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Subtle pg_dump problem... (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: Subtle pg_dump problem...
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 12 May 2004, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > No problem, > > Actually, I did some more testing and I properly understand the problem > now - and it won't happen in the general restoring case. > > What fails is if you "pg_dump -a" to just dump the DATA from a table > containing a tsearch2 trigger that is in a different schema. > > Then you delete all the rows from the table. > > Then you try to execute the sql script created from pg_dump to restore > the data. > > It will fail because the sql script will automatically set the > search_path to public, pg_catalog. And then as the COPY command inserts > each row, it will fail immediately as the tsearch2 trigger will not be > able to find its config table. > > Does that make sense? Hmm, what other hackers thinks ? This is not just a tsearch2 problem, it could happens with any such kind of things, like defining user defined type in one scheme, using it in another, dumping separate data. Could pg_dump be enough smart to set search_path properly ? > > Chris > Regards, Oleg _____________________________________________________________ Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet, Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia) Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/ phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: