Re: [NOT] (LIKE|ILIKE) (ANY|ALL) (...)

> Possibly.  The case that I thought was a real bad idea was actually the
> one in def_arg --- we don't want that doing any behind-the-scenes
> translation of words to other things.  The ORDER BY case is just silly.

Ok. So the current code is silly, but the patch must be sound;-)

> > Or the rule factorization must be changed. It can also be done.
>
> Yes.  I think we must have an all_subselect_ops or similar.

I'll do that and resubmit later.

--
Fabien Coelho - coelho@cri.ensmp.fr