Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !!
| От | Oleg Bartunov |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | Pine.GSO.4.31.0101121706540.10200-100000@ra.sai.msu.su обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! (Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>) |
| Ответы |
Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !!
Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Hannu Krosing wrote: > Oleg Bartunov wrote: > > > > OK. We found an old implementation of R-Tre using GiST (Pg95) > > and we'll try to implement regression test using R-Tree > > it's anyway will be a good test. > > How is it different than using RD-tree for tests ? > No difference at all ! It's just another implemetation of R-Tree. > Can you do it usin already compiled-in functions and modifying > things only at SQL level ? > unfortunately not ! Current postgres code has nothing connected with GiST and this is a problem ! How to test interface code without having two sides ? I understand we don't want to have another reason for complaints about non-working regression test. I never got regression test passed 100% on my Linux box with almost all versions of PostgreSQL but I could live with that. What's wrong with warning message if GiST test not passed ? > Or is it just much simpler ? > I'm interesting to test performance of built-in R-Tree and R-Tree + GiST. Oleg > --------------------- > Hannu > Regards, Oleg _____________________________________________________________ Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet, Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia) Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/ phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: