Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY and shift/reduce)
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY and shift/reduce) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.GSO.4.02A.9912071904440.3057-100000@Panter.DoCS.UU.SE обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY and shift/reduce) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY and shift/reduce)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 7 Dec 1999, Tom Lane wrote: > wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) writes: > > I'm thinking about another enhancement to the regression test > > now. Something where at least two sessions can run queries > > in a predefined order. Otherwise, something like the above > > cannot be checked during regression. > Peter, in your slicing and dicing of psql, did you end up with anything > that might make this a feasible approach? Um, you could call another psql from within psql, like so: /* psql script */ create this select that \! psql -f 'second-script' select more That satisfies the requirement of two separate sessions and a predefined order. I haven't actually tried it, but if it happens to not work as desired, it could certainly be fixed. -- Peter Eisentraut Sernanders vaeg 10:115 peter_e@gmx.net 75262 Uppsala http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: