Re: [HACKERS] RFC: create/alter user extension
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] RFC: create/alter user extension |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.GSO.4.02A.9911131436450.606-100000@Val.DoCS.UU.SE обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] RFC: create/alter user extension (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] RFC: create/alter user extension
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 12 Nov 1999, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > > Is everyone okay with the following syntax: > > CREATE USER username > > [ WITH ID digits ] > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > The catch is that ID would have to be a new keyword and we'd have to live > > with that for a long time. Other choices include: > > * UID > > * SYSID > > * USESYSID > > etc. > > I'd be inclined to go with UID or SYSID. In any case, since the new > keyword is used in such a limited context, we could almost certainly > still allow it as a ColId and thus not create any real compatibility > problem. I'm not sure about this distinction. Where would that be reflected in the (parser) code? -Peter -- Peter Eisentraut Sernanders vaeg 10:115 peter_e@gmx.net 75262 Uppsala http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: