Re: [SQL] database with 1000000 rows is very slow
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [SQL] database with 1000000 rows is very slow |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.GSO.4.02A.10003060817320.17581-100000@Svan.DoCS.UU.SE обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | database with 1000000 rows is very slow (David Celjuska <dcsoft@dcsoft.sk>) |
Список | pgsql-sql |
On Sun, 5 Mar 2000, David Celjuska wrote: > CREATE UNIQUE INDEX "article_pkey" on "article" using btree ( "id" > "varchar_ops" ); > this database store. But I think that select * from article where id > like 'something%' is very slow (some minutes) and query as: select * > from article where id='something' is very slow too. I don't know where > is a problem a I would like optimalise this, but how can I do it? If you haven't run vacuum analyze lately then you should do that. > When I use hash except btree, query as: select * from article where > id='something' is fast but select * from article where id='something%' > is very slow. Yup. That's because hashes only work on exact matches and btrees can do ordering (like 'somethink' is surely "larger" than 'something%'). > Or postgresql make indexes automaticly? No, you have to make them, but you did that right. > How can I see that postgres use/or no use index on some query? It is > possible? Yup. EXPLAIN SELECT .... In fact, if you can't make any progress you should always accompany any optimizer issues with the EXPLAIN output. That will help our optimizer gurus. :) -- Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115 peter_e@gmx.net 75262 Uppsala http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: