Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!?
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.GSO.4.02A.10001311438530.12762-100000@Hund.DoCS.UU.SE обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!?
Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > On Sat, 29 Jan 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > However, I can't find any macro that uses this like makeNode does with > > > its pasteing. I would perhaps move it to a _deadcode directory and see > > > what happens. Or should we enable it? > > > > Please no more _deadcode. Why do we have CVS? > > > > (In the same spirit it would also be nice to tag NOT_USED sections with a > > version number, so it could be yanked two or three releases past.) > > Why not just yank it period? 'cvs diff' will show what was yanked, and > the log message could say just 'yanked NOT_USED code from source tree'... I *suspect* the purpose of some of these sections is that if it turns out somebody needed them for their application, we could just tell them to re-enable them there and there. If this is the case, then it has gone way past abuse already, though. Some parts of been NOT_USED for many years and most likely don't work anymore. -- Peter Eisentraut Sernanders vaeg 10:115 peter_e@gmx.net 75262 Uppsala http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: