Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble?
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.GSO.3.96.991019182852.24574B-100000@enequist.csd.uu.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble?
Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 19 Oct 1999, Tom Lane wrote: > Huh? We certainly do --- or have you missed that > * Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California > that's plastered across all the source files? Regarding which I have a question: at other locations I see (c) 1994-7 Univ. of California, or even (c) 1996-9 PostgreSQL Global Development Team. I am not an expert in any of this, but I'm just wondering: when did the involvement of the U of C end, when was the Global Development Team (tm) formed and do both copyrights exits in parallel? What if someone contributes something really major and fairly independent (say like pg_access) and wants to keep his own copyright (with compatible license of course)? And is the PostgreSQL Global Development Team any real entity that could theoretically enforce that copyright or is it just an alias for "whoever contributed"? -Peter -- Peter Eisentraut Sernanders vaeg 10:115 peter_e@gmx.net 75262 Uppsala http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: