Re: Performance of jdbc insert statements and select nextval
От | Kris Jurka |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Performance of jdbc insert statements and select nextval |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSO.4.64.0902201230530.23634@leary.csoft.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Performance of jdbc insert statements and select nextval (ralf.baumhof@bgs-ag.de) |
Ответы |
Re: Performance of jdbc insert statements and select
nextval
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009, ralf.baumhof@bgs-ag.de wrote: > [insert with pgadmin is faster than JDBC] As I explained previously I believe pgadmin is sending all of your inserts in one network roundtrip rather than a single insert at a time. So for example: StringBuffer sql = new StringBuffer(); for (int i=0; i<100; i++) { sql.append("INSERT INTO mytable (a) VALUES ("); sql.append(i).append(")"); } Statement.execute(sql.toString()) will be faster than for (int i=0; i<100; i++) { String sql = "INSERT INTO mytable (a) VALUES (" + i + ")"; Statement.execute(sql); } because the second sample has to make 100 network trips instead of just one. > I made a test with "logical" insert of objects which results in 50000 > inserts can be done within 2 minutes, what means 416 inserts per second, > or 1 insert in 2/1000 sec (2ms). The cost estimate with explain for an > insert is on the other hand is 0,4 ms. Explain cost estimates do not have units of milliseconds, so the comparison is invalid. Kris Jurka
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: