Re: COPY support in JDBC driver?
От | Kris Jurka |
---|---|
Тема | Re: COPY support in JDBC driver? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSO.4.64.0809241413280.6934@leary.csoft.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: COPY support in JDBC driver? (Daniel Migowski <dmigowski@ikoffice.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: COPY support in JDBC driver?
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Daniel Migowski wrote: > AFAIK is UTF-8 the only encoding which the driver supports, anyway. And > the native Java encoding, too. In my opinion the API should either > support Writers and Readers (instead of Output- and InputStream), so the > application has to take care for the encoding itself, or the API should > encapsulate setting an arbitrary encoding on the server side before the > copy command, and return to the default encoding directly afterwards. > Yes, the current copy patches only support *Stream which does leave the user exposed to encoding issues. Providing a Reader/Writer API doesn't support COPY ... BINARY, but I don't know how many people would actually use such a thing. Parallel interfaces are a possibility, but I'd guess people would end up using the Stream versions for non-binary data anyway. Does anyone have the need to do COPY BINARY? I also wonder what the encoding conversion hit is if no conversion needs to be done. Perhaps we should measure that before abandonding the Stream API? Kris Jurka
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: