Re: Couple of preparedstatement bug suspects
От | Kris Jurka |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Couple of preparedstatement bug suspects |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSO.4.64.0805091532320.13570@leary.csoft.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Couple of preparedstatement bug suspects ("Roy Smith" <roy.smith@primetext.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Couple of preparedstatement bug suspects
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On Fri, 9 May 2008, Roy Smith wrote: > No the app is not multithreaded. It's a web app and I'm the only user on my > local test PC. So I start tomcat, run a single post which generates the > error, stop tomcat. Then I don't understand how it got closed mid-execution, perhaps some sort of intermediate pooling/proxying mechanism is involved? If you can compose a self-contained test case, I'd be happy to look at it. > I didn't understand your 2nd point. When I call > PreparedStatement.executeUpdate() I have to know that the row did or did > not get written. If there is a situation that an exception can be thrown > after the data has been written, that exception needs to be unambiguous > in telling the caller that the data is written or not. > To get this control you shouldn't be using autocommit. You should turn that off and then rollback if you get a SQLException. With autocommit, the cats already out of the bag. Kris Jurka
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: