Need -fwrapv or -fno-strict-overflow for gcc-4.3
От | Kris Jurka |
---|---|
Тема | Need -fwrapv or -fno-strict-overflow for gcc-4.3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSO.4.64.0803100130580.30353@leary.csoft.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Need -fwrapv or -fno-strict-overflow for gcc-4.3
Re: Need -fwrapv or -fno-strict-overflow for gcc-4.3 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
A while back Tom Lane presented the potential problem with gcc signed overflow handling, but now it's not just a theoretical problem. http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-12/msg00635.php Gcc 4.3 has started to perform optimizations based on the denial of the existence of signed overflow. Building CVS HEAD with gcc 4.3rc2 I get the following warnings: localtime.c:1223: warning: assuming signed overflow does not occur when assuming that (X + c) < X is always false localtime.c:1227: warning: assuming signed overflow does not occur when assuming that (X - c) > X is always false array_userfuncs.c:100: warning: assuming signed overflow does not occur when assuming that (X - c) > X is always false float.c:2696: warning: assuming signed overflow does not occur when assuming that (X + c) < X is always false float.c:2712: warning: assuming signed overflow does not occur when assuming that (X + c) < X is always false oracle_compat.c:1479: warning: assuming signed overflow does not occur when assuming that (X + c) < X is always false I don't understand the difference between -fwrapv and -fno-strict-aliasing, but it seems we need at least one of them. http://www.airs.com/blog/archives/120 Kris Jurka
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: