Re: GSSAPI and V2 protocol
От | Kris Jurka |
---|---|
Тема | Re: GSSAPI and V2 protocol |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSO.4.64.0802060247490.8123@leary.csoft.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: GSSAPI and V2 protocol (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: GSSAPI and V2 protocol
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Tom Lane wrote: > The problem seems to be that AuthenticationGSSContinue messages carry > a variable-length payload, and the V2 protocol doesn't really cope with > that because it doesn't have a message length word. > > 1. If the GSSContinue payload is self-identifying about its length, > qwe could teach fe-connect.c how to determine that. The GSS data is supposed to be opaque to the caller, so this doesn't seem likely or a good idea. > 2. We could retroactively redefine the contents of > AuthenticationGSSContinue as carrying a length word after the > authentication type code, but only in V2 protocol (so as not to break > existing working cases). This is pretty ugly but certainly possible. I see no harm in doing this. What's there now can't work and the change is self contained. Is there any problem with the password message taking a "String" datatype instead of Byte[n] with a null byte? Kris Jurka
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: