Re: So, why isn't *every* buildfarm member failing ecpg right now?
От | Kris Jurka |
---|---|
Тема | Re: So, why isn't *every* buildfarm member failing ecpg right now? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSO.4.64.0706041305530.19394@leary.csoft.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: So, why isn't *every* buildfarm member failing ecpg right now? (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: So, why isn't *every* buildfarm member failing ecpg
right now?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > turnip_moth is also a Solaris 9 box and doesn't seem have the same issue. > > Kris, is there anything unusual installed on the box that would make it > behave like this? > Not sure what's going on here. I did a manual run of the ecpg tests and it completed normally. This machine is quite out of date and it has a large mix of GNU tools with the solaris ones. Since turnip_moth is maintained by Sun I would expect it to be up to date on patches and have few non-Sun tools installed. So it could be using a different interpreter or it could be using a broken tool for which a patch has been released. I'll try doing a run with the buildfarm client later today to try and reproduce this. Kris Jurka
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: