Re: XA end then join fix for WebLogic
От | Kris Jurka |
---|---|
Тема | Re: XA end then join fix for WebLogic |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSO.4.64.0612010728090.20488@leary2.csoft.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: XA end then join fix for WebLogic ("Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: XA end then join fix for WebLogic
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > Kris Jurka wrote: >> Doesn't this allow: >> >> xaRes.start(xid, XAResource.TMNOFLAGS); >> xaRes.end(xid, XAResource.TMFAIL); >> xaRes.start(xid, XAResource.TMJOIN); >> xaRes.end(xid, XAResource.TMSUCCESS); >> xaRes.commit(xid, true); >> >> Is that actually a problem or do we assume the TM is smart enough not to do >> this. > > Hmm, true, it does allow that. > > The TM really shouldn't be doing that. It's very confused if it does. > However, given the sorry state of many TMs out there, it'd be nice if we did > check for that. > > I'd say let's not bother checking that for now. In the future, we should roll > back the transaction on end(TMFAIL) immediately, and add checking for that > case as well. The way it works now is perfectly correct and legal, we're just > not taking advantage of the hint the TM is giving us. > OK. Applied. Kris Jurka
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: