Re: 2x compile warning

On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:

> Perhaps someone could check if changing the test explicitly check
> against NULL:
>
>>             ((attnum) > (int) (tup)->t_data->t_natts) ? \
>>             ( \
>>                 (((isnull) != NULL)? (*(isnull) = true) : (dummyret)NULL), \
>>                 (Datum)NULL \
>
> removes the warning. It seems silly for the GCC people to add warnings
> for this kind of stuff without a simple way to bypass it...

Yes, this coding removes the warning.

Kris Jurka