Re: Behaviour of setAutoCommit may not be completely correct.
От | Kris Jurka |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Behaviour of setAutoCommit may not be completely correct. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSO.4.63.0604010303390.13853@leary.csoft.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Behaviour of setAutoCommit may not be completely correct. (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Behaviour of setAutoCommit may not be completely correct.
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On Sat, 1 Apr 2006, Tom Lane wrote: > It looks to me like Sun is trying to clarify their reading of that > detail with the javadoc change. It's a crummy way to handle it; they > should have updated the spec. But I'd say the handwriting is on the > wall about what the next spec version will say. > The JDBC 4.0 public draft spec says: The default is for auto-commit mode to be enabled when the Connection object is created. If the value of auto-commit is changed in the middle of a transaction, the current transaction is committed. If setAutoCommit is called and the value for auto-commit is not changed from its current value, it is treated as a no-op. The JDK1.6 beta2 javadoc confirms this: NOTE: If this method is called during a transaction and the auto-commit mode is changed, the transaction is committed. If setAutoCommit is called and the auto-commit mode is not changed, the call is a no-op. So I think we're fine. Kris Jurka
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: