Re: XA
От | Kris Jurka |
---|---|
Тема | Re: XA |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSO.4.61.0509300016270.9723@leary.csoft.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: XA (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Josh Berkus wrote: > But ... now that we have 2PC, XA could be implemented through pg-jdbc if > someone wanted to, yes? > We have patches for xa support pending, but have not committed them yet. Our 2PC support doesn't allow a full XA implementation because full XA allows multiple transactions to run in parallel on the same resource and allows other threads to join an already running transaction. The question is whether application servers and transaction managers do this by default and whether it can be disabled. Initial research shows our support may be good enough for practical purposes. http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-jdbc/2005-06/msg00165.php http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-jdbc/2005-06/msg00171.php Kris Jurka
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: