Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method
От | Kris Jurka |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSO.4.56.0508081907070.29622@leary.csoft.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > So the short answer is possibly "You build the tests and we'll run 'em." > Automated performance testing seems like a bad idea for the buildfarm. Consider in my particular case I've got three members that all happen to be running in virtual machines on the same host. What virtualization does for performance and what happens when all three members are running at the same time renders any results beyond useless. Certainly soliciting the pgbuildfarm-members@pgfoundry.org list is good idea, but I don't think automating this testing is a good idea without more knowledge of the machines and their other workloads. Kris Jurka
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: