Re: BLOBs etc
От | Kris Jurka |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BLOBs etc |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSO.4.56.0501070029280.743@leary.csoft.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BLOBs etc (Sven Köhler <skoehler@upb.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: BLOBs etc
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, [ISO-8859-15] Sven Köhler wrote: > But still the postgresql server could accept the data generated by the > JDBC-driver's "setBinaryStream()" even for oid columns. Isn't that the > missing piece to make set/getBinaryStream() methods work for oid columns? That would work, but it's not going to happen. Setting up and using a large object is completely different than just stashing data in a bytea field. Convincing the server to do simple conversions is difficult enough, getting it to do something of this magnitude is out of the question. > Is it known how other JDBC drivers handle this problems? The real problem here is that pg has two binary data types that work quite differently and each have significant strengths/weaknesses. Other databases don't have this predicament. If we only had one or one was clearly superior or they used a remotely similar API we'd be set. Kris Jurka
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: