Re: executeBatch() issue with new driver?
От | Kris Jurka |
---|---|
Тема | Re: executeBatch() issue with new driver? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSO.4.56.0411021427540.3642@leary.csoft.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | executeBatch() issue with new driver? (Alan Stange <stange@rentec.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: executeBatch() issue with new driver?
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, Alan Stange wrote: > >This is something (as discussed with Dave) that you shouldn't be doing, > > > Let me be devils advocate for a second and ask "why not"? I don't > disagree, but I'm not sure I understand all the issues here. > The real problem is that executeBatch() returns an int[] of update counts. What should we return for an entry like addBatch("INSERT ... ; INSERT ..."); ? Two individual entries? The sum of the update counts? The javadoc for executeBatch isn't entirely clear, but certainly seems to make the assumption that one batch entry is one command. Especially since you are already using addBatch, there doesn't seem to be much point in jamming two commands into one batch. Kris Jurka
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: