On Sat, 23 Oct 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> An alternative that might be worth investigating is to specify the type
> as varchar instead of text. I am not sure of all the ramifications of
> this but in 7.4 and later it seems like it might do what you want.
>
Yes, that seems to work and doesn't seem to break anything else, so that's
what I've done.
Kris Jurka